Merged
Conversation
Owner
|
Thank you @kost. Feel free to open more pull requests if you want to have mingw support merged in too. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is small fix, as building x64 build would never build without .asm file which you have in other projects :)
I've included nmake makefile for building x64 version, feel free to include same in VC GUI if needed...
You want to check "kost" branch of "shellcodeexec" as it have mingw support:
https://github.com/kost/shellcodeexec
Which means I can compile windows binaries using Linux/Mac and resulting binaries are much smaller (UPXed win32 is smaller than 4 kb):
https://github.com/kost/shellcodeexec/tree/kost/bin
Also, maybe you want to take a look at scexec which is shellcodeexec on steroids:
https://github.com/kost/scexec
it supports base64/uudecode shellcode, etc..