[arocheleau]

The way the EqualityComparerEquivalencyStep<T> step is comparing the comparand's type against the equality comparer's type has been reviewed to take into account nullables.

This fixes #2595.

IMPORTANT

• If the PR touches the public API, the changes have been approved in a separate issue with the "api-approved" label.
• The code complies with the Coding Guidelines for C#.
• The changes are covered by unit tests which follow the Arrange-Act-Assert syntax and the naming conventions such as is used in these tests.
• If the PR adds a feature or fixes a bug, please update the release notes with a functional description that explains what the change means to consumers of this library, which are published on the website.
• If the PR changes the public API the changes needs to be included by running AcceptApiChanges.ps1 or AcceptApiChanges.sh.
• If the PR affects the documentation, please include your changes in this pull request so the documentation will appear on the website.
  • Please also run ./build.sh --target spellcheck or .\build.ps1 --target spellcheck before pushing and check the good outcome

[github-actions]

Qodana for .NET

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at qodana-support@jetbrains.com

• Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue
• Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9224869081

Details

• 2 of 2 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 97.566%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 9161168279:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	12055
Relevant Lines:	12239

---

💛 - Coveralls

[dennisdoomen]

Thanks. In addition to the comments from @IT-VBFK, I have nothing more to add than a suggestion