Repository navigation
GraphQL ignored-error-types should not rely only on ErrorClassification.toString() #6020
Description
Problem Statement
I am using the GraphQL integration with:
io.sentry:sentry-spring-boot-4io.sentry:sentry-graphql-22- Sentry Java SDK
8.42.0 com.graphql-java:graphql-java-extended-validation:24.0
I want to ignore expected GraphQL validation errors produced by graphql-java-extended-validation.
The configuration looks like this:
sentry.graphql.ignored-error-types:
- BAD_REQUEST
- UNAUTHORIZED
- FORBIDDEN
- NOT_FOUND
- ExtendedValidationErrorThis works well for enum-like ErrorClassification values, but it does not work reliably for errors from graphql-java-extended-validation.
From what I can see, SentryGraphqlInstrumentation currently resolves the error type with:
error.getErrorType().toString()and then compares that string with ignoredErrorTypes.
The problem is that graphql-java-extended-validation uses a private ResourceBundleMessageInterpolator.ValidationErrorType class. It does not expose a stable enum-like value via toString(). The semantic classification is exposed through ErrorClassification.toSpecification(...), which returns a map like:
{
"type": "ExtendedValidationError",
"validatedPath": [...],
"constraint": "@..."
}Because of this, I currently have to work around the issue by replacing the extended-validation MessageInterpolator and returning a custom ErrorClassification whose toString() returns ExtendedValidationError only when called from Sentry:
override fun toString(): String {
if (stackWalker.callerClass == SentryGraphqlInstrumentation::class.java) {
return "ExtendedValidationError"
}
return super.toString()
}That workaround is brittle and depends on Sentry internals.
This looks related to #2899, which added easier GraphQL error filtering. The current string-based filtering solves enum-like classifications, but it is hard to use with custom ErrorClassification implementations where toSpecification(...) carries the meaningful classification.
Solution Brainstorm
Could Sentry support a more robust way to classify ignored GraphQL errors?
A few possible approaches:
-
When
error.getErrorType()is present, callerrorType.toSpecification(error)and, if it returns a map containing atypefield, allowignored-error-typesto match that value. -
Add a callback/predicate for GraphQL errors. This would allow applications to inspect GraphQLError, ErrorClassification, extensions, path, etc.
-
Pass the GraphQLError and/or ErrorClassification through the Sentry Hint, as mentioned in Easier way of filtering errors for GraphQL #2899, so users can filter these events in beforeSend without replacing the whole GraphQL instrumentation.
My preference would be option 1 for configuration compatibility, possibly combined with option 3 for advanced filtering.
This would also make the Sentry GraphQL integration work out of the box with graphql-java-extended-validation, which is an official companion library from the graphql-java project. Since Sentry Java already integrates with graphql-java, it would be helpful if expected validation errors from this commonly used library could be ignored without replacing the message interpolator or depending on ErrorClassification.toString().
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Projects
- StatusShow more project fieldsNo status
Activity
linear-code commentedon Aug 27, 2026
JAVA-713
adinauer commentedon Sep 1, 2026
Thank you for opening this issue @arturs678 .
Also checking
toSpecificationsounds like a useful addition to the SDK.Also adding more details to
Hintsounds good.We'll add this to the backlog but can't say when exactly we'll tackle this.