Repository navigation
docs: test orchestration pattern decision table (AR-20) - #894
warp-agent-staging[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
This PR was generated with Warp. Comment |
|
Autoresearch: AR-20261009-20 is ready for review.
|
|
@warp-agent-staging[bot] I'm starting a first review of this pull request. You can view the conversation on Warp. I completed the review and no human review was requested for this pull request. Comment Powered by Oz |
|
@warp-agent-staging[bot] I'm starting a first review of this pull request. You can view the conversation on Warp. I completed the review and no human review was requested for this pull request. Comment Powered by Oz |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overview
This PR rewrites the opening sentence of the multi-agent orchestration page and replaces the Common patterns introduction with a scannable decision table. The new table links each existing pattern to existing anchors and documented orchestration features without adding commands, examples, UI labels, or new behavior.
Concerns
- No blocking concerns found in the annotated diff.
- No security-sensitive code or configuration changes were introduced.
spec_context.mdstates that no approved or repository spec context was found, so there are no spec commitments to validate against.
Verdict
Found: 0 critical, 0 important, 0 suggestions
Approve
Comment /warp-agent-review on this pull request to retrigger a review (up to 3 times on the same pull request).
Powered by Oz
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review summary
The independent agent completed its review for this commit.
Findings
src/content/docs/platform/orchestration/index.mdx:90— [IMPORTANT] The Critic and verifier row says "Messaging carries review notes and follow-up instructions between writer and critic," but the page says the critic returns notes and that messages are coordination signals, not the substance of the work. Requested change: rewrite the row to match documented behavior (critic output returns notes to the parent; the parent can send follow-up instructions through messaging) or remove the mechanism claim.src/content/docs/platform/orchestration/index.mdx:86— [IMPORTANT] Risk misclassification:Risk: lowis declared, but the new "Warp feature behind the pattern" column adds mechanism claims (lifecycle events, messaging, inboxes), and the cited sources are the same page andmulti-agent-runs.mdxat@main, not pinned product source. Requested change: setRisk: engineering-review-required, cite pinned source files at@<sha>, and request the owning engineer; or limit the column to wording already stated verbatim in the existing sections so low risk holds.src/content/docs/platform/orchestration/index.mdx:93— [SUGGESTION] The Swarm row says "loose coordination rather than a strict hierarchy" and then "the parent remains the coordinator", and implies peer-to-peer messaging the page doesn't document. Requested change: reword to match the Swarm section and drop "peer" or "inboxes" unless sibling messaging is confirmed.src/content/docs/platform/orchestration/index.mdx:88— [SUGGESTION] The "When to use it" column restates the "Use this when..." sentences in each pattern section, and the page is 2,110 words against the 1,500-word budget. Requested change: trim the duplicated use-when sentences from the sections or justify the added length in the PR body.src/content/docs/platform/orchestration/index.mdx:10— [SUGGESTION] The first sentence "Warp coordinates multiple agents through a parent agent..." no longer names "multi-agent orchestration", the concept the page defines and the PR targets. Requested change: lead with the term, for example "Multi-agent orchestration in Warp lets a parent agent spawn child agents...".
Verdict
Request changes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overview
This PR updates the multi-agent orchestration page opening to lead with Warp and adds a scannable decision table connecting the six existing orchestration patterns to documented coordination features.
Concerns
- No blocking concerns found. The change stays within a low-risk copy/cross-link update, preserves the existing one-level parent/child model, and does not add new commands, UI paths, availability claims, permissions, or security-sensitive behavior.
- No approved or repository spec context was supplied for this PR, so there is no material spec drift to flag.
Verdict
Found: 0 critical, 0 important, 0 suggestions
Approve
Comment /warp-agent-review on this pull request to retrigger a review (up to 3 times on the same pull request).
Powered by Oz
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review summary
The independent agent completed its review for this commit.
Findings
src/content/docs/platform/orchestration/index.mdx:10— [SUGGESTION] "Warp uses multi-agent orchestration to let a parent agent spawn child agents..." is indirect and drops "coordinate" from the original sentence. Requested change: reword to lead with the concept, e.g. "Multi-agent orchestration in Warp lets a parent agent spawn and coordinate child agents to work in parallel, handle specialized tasks, or verify output."src/content/docs/platform/orchestration/index.mdx:88— [SUGGESTION] Table labels ("Supervisor and worker", "Fan-out and fan-in", "Critic and verifier") don't match the linked headings ("Supervisor / worker", "Fan-out / fan-in", "Critic / verifier"). Requested change: use one name per pattern, preferably by matching the table labels to the headings so anchors stay stable.src/content/docs/platform/orchestration/index.mdx:90— [SUGGESTION] "The critic's output returns notes to the parent" is circular and doesn't say how notes get back. Requested change: reword concretely, e.g. "The critic child reports its notes in its final output; the parent sends follow-up instructions through messaging."src/content/docs/platform/orchestration/index.mdx:93— [SUGGESTION] The "Warp feature behind the pattern" column mostly restates the pattern (e.g. the Supervisor row) rather than naming a feature, and the table drops trade-offs the sections carried (Swarm "Use sparingly - swarms are harder to debug"; Critic "correctness matters more than throughput"). Requested change: rename the column (e.g. "What Warp provides") and keep only rows naming a real feature, or add the trade-offs to the "When to use it" cells for Swarm and Critic; consider trimming rows that duplicate the section text on a ~2,000-word page.
Verdict
Approve
Summary
Experiment: AR-20261009-20
Lead the orchestration answer with Warp and add a decision table connecting six existing patterns to their documented coordination features. Preserve the detailed sections, their anchors, and the one-level parent/child limitation.
Hypothesis (unproven): naming Warp in the answer and linking each pattern to concrete coordination features improves semantic matching and citation retrieval for orchestration-pattern prompts.
Metric: Peec orchestration-pattern prompt, Sep 25–Oct 8, 2026; Warp visibility 0/42, warp.dev retrieval 2/42; IBM and MS Learn dominate citations.
Prediction: retrieval ≥6/42 within three weeks of merge.
Rollback: revert this one-page copy change if the three-week result does not support the hypothesis.
Related issues
Every pattern and feature already exists on Multi-agent orchestration: parent/child model, state transitions, agent messaging, and six common pattern sections. Running orchestrated agents documents launch surfaces. No new workflow, nesting, messaging, or isolation guarantee.
Content design plan
Worthiness: existing-page re-presentation of documented configurable orchestration; no new page or rollout claim.
Validation
How verified: committed changed-file style lint (only pre-existing glossary warnings), UI-reference checks, typecheck (0 errors), heading-variable tests (5/5), build, heading TOCs (3,353 entries), homepage JSON-LD, and internal links (4,370 checked; 0 broken) pass. Full diff and whitespace self-reviewed. Trunk unavailable locally. Pure copy; no code behavior test required. CI and G2 remain delivery gates.
G2: PASS (no check score regresses). Public curl proves the Warp-first opening and six-pattern table at https://docs-git-factory-ar-20261009-20-orchestration-warpdotdev.vercel.app/platform/orchestration/.
npx -y @ora-ai/ax@0.5 audit https://docs-git-factory-ar-20261009-20-orchestration-warpdotdev.vercel.app --json --forcecompleted; control 56/100 → PR 55/100. All 125 check scores are identical. The pricing-md and pricing-info na→fail flip is an applicability reclassification (also seen on unrelated docs #885), 0 points; aggregate denominator effect only. This preview-host classifier noise is documented, not attributed to copy or waived as a content regression. The first scan returned “Agentic search not available”; the single allowed forced scan restored its normal control-matching score. No production comparison; no feedback submission; forced scans: 1.CI: Docs editorial quality, Docs technical references, Build/link-check/audit, CodeQL, and Vercel passed for this head. Editing evidence can trigger another contract/build run.
Visual proof: Chromium preview verification shows the opening and full table wrapping legibly, without clipping or overflow. The Critic and verifier link reaches the existing Critic / verifier heading. Static screenshots attached below.
Control vs PR — all 125 checks
ard-catalogai-catalog-publishedard-entries-validard-trust-manifestagentic-search-usecaseagentic-search-specificbrand-search-accuracywikipedia-presencerobots-ai-policy-qualitymcp-registry-listednpm-sdk-packageagent-rules-repoagent-plugins-reporegistry-brandingchatgpt-app-listedsitemapcontent-no-jsbot-detectionagent-discovery-fileagent-skills-index-v2a2a-agent-cardskills-sh-listedpricing-mdnlweb-schema-feedsmcp-well-known-discoveryagent-mode-viewlink-headers-discoverymarkdown-url-fallbackmodular-llms-txtsitemap-lastmodrobots-agent-user-policyllms-txt-existsllms-txt-formattingjson-ldpricing-infopublic-api-docsagent-instructionskills-sh-qualityjson-ld-entity-linkingmetadata-completenessorg-schema-completenessschema-type-breadthtrust-anchorsllms-txt-links-resolvemarkdown-link-alternatemarkdown-frontmatterredirect-hygienepage-token-budgetcode-fence-validitydocs-auth-gateopenapi-specdeveloper-portalapi-catalog-rfc9727markdown-negotiationmarkdown-negotiation-varyagent-ua-markdownagent-crawler-reachabilitymcp-tool-descriptionsmcp-param-schemasmcp-server-identitymcp-tool-listingmcp-tool-namingpublic-apioauth-supportscoped-permissionsmcp-auth-mechanismmcp-oauth-metadatamcp-pkce-s256onboarding-frictionweb-bot-auth-directoryoauth-protected-resourceauth-md-existsauth-md-structureauth-md-walkthrough-simulationagent-auth-discovery-metadataagent-auth-www-authenticateagent-auth-endpoints-reachablemcp-servermcp-error-handlingmcp-transport-modernwebmcprate-limit-headersidempotency-key-supportjson-error-responsesapi-error-modelapi-versioning-policypagination-shapeasync-job-patterncli-toolrest-sdk-packagesnlweb-asknlweb-streamingresponse-schema-coveragemcp-tool-annotationsmcp-server-cardmcp-multi-surface-coveragesandbox-environmentbatch-endpointsmcp-resource-listinggraphql-error-type-definitiongraphql-versioning-policygraphql-pagination-patterngraphql-async-job-patterngraphql-schema-completenessgraphql-batch-mutationsagent-friendly-404ax-document-structureax-native-controlsax-accessible-namesax-form-labelingax-tree-injection-safemcp-app-registrya2ui-supportmcp-apps-ui-qualitymcp-view-domainmcp-view-cspapi-schema-analysisfunction-calling-compatmcp-resource-qualitympp-supportx402-supportucp-supportacp-supportacp-delegate-paymentap2-supportReview revision
Commit:
efaa61faad467abcf2cfbc7d3c1e170fbe97fe7d. Raised risk to engineering-review-required with pinned canonical sources; corrected critic output versus follow-up messaging, removed peer/inbox implications from the Swarm row, restored the primary orchestration term, and cut repeated use-when sentences.How verified: repeated local typecheck, heading-variable tests, build, rendered heading TOCs, homepage JSON-LD, internal links, changed-file style lint, and technical-reference validation passed. Public curl and browser inspection confirm this revised copy; screenshots labeled revision/revised supersede the original captures (unlabeled original AR-19/AR-20 captures retained as historical context only).
Re-ran the non-forced domain audit command: servedFromCache=True, scannedAt=2026-10-09T19:14:30.81+00:00; it still matches all 125 control scores, with the documented pricing applicability classification. This is cached domain-level G2 evidence, not a claim that ora freshly crawled the revised content. Public HTML/browser proof is fresh. No additional forced scan; total remains 1.
Follow-ups
Length decision: the existing conceptual overview already exceeds 1,500 words and owns the parent/child limit, execution locations, lifecycle, messaging, approval, and observability. This experiment retains that canonical scope rather than splitting unrelated sections. The revision removes duplicated use-when sentences from four pattern details; the table carries decision guidance while details retain workflow behavior and existing anchors.
Documentation risk
Risk: engineering-review-required
Rationale: The pattern table summarizes public orchestration mechanisms, including lifecycle events, child results, and follow-up messaging. Engineering-review-required under the technical-claim policy.
Source files consulted: src/content/docs/platform/orchestration/index.mdx@dd1fcba374f271832a7ee116f1082cb016e47dd3, src/content/docs/platform/orchestration/multi-agent-runs.mdx@dd1fcba374f271832a7ee116f1082cb016e47dd3
Requested engineering reviewers: none (no owning engineer resolved with certainty; existing human reviewer requests unchanged)
Engineering review status: pending
Docs override: none
Pinned canonical source evidence (existing public docs; not a claim of live product-code validation):
Unverified claims
No unresolved VERIFY markers. Answer-engine effects are hypotheses. Engineering review remains pending for the table’s technical summaries; no docs verification or waiver is asserted.
Computer-use screenshots (10)
AR-19 triggers: Triggers overview opening and start of Available trigger types table
AR-19 triggers: remaining rows of Available trigger types table and Related pages
AR-20 title and opening paragraph on deployed Multi-agent orchestration page
Full Common patterns comparison table on deployed AR-20 page
AR-17 revision (opening): Measure and improve a factory page
AR-17 revision (ROI section): Measuring agent ROI and Dashboard metrics table, wrapping without clipping
AR-20 revision (opening): Multi-agent orchestration page top
AR-20 revision (Common patterns table): three-column table wraps legibly, no clipping
AR-19 revised opening and trigger table rows Slack through Schedules, including Jira Cloud and GitHub
AR-19 trigger table remaining rows (GitHub through Custom webhooks), completing all nine triggers